fbpx
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Legal Notices
Lagniappe Mobile
  • News
    • Cover Story
    • Latest
    • Serial Stories
    • Bay Briefs
    • Community News
    • Open Documents
    • e-Edition
  • Baldwin
  • Commentary
    • Damn the Torpedoes
    • Hidden Agenda
    • Beltway Beat
    • The Real Deal
    • Weather Things
    • The Gadfly
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Cuisine
    • The Dish
    • Word of Mouth
    • Beer and Loathing
    • Cuisine Directory
  • Arts
    • Artifice
    • Art Gallery
    • The Reel World
    • Calendar
  • Music
    • Music Feature
    • Music Briefs
    • Music Listings
    • Submissions
  • Sports
    • The Score
    • The Starting Line-Up
    • From Behind The Mic
    • Upon Further Review
  • Style
    • Media Frenzy
    • Mobile Magnified
    • Horoscopes
    • Master Gardeners
    • Style Feature
  • Lagniappe HD
  • Lagnia-POD

Select Page

Don’t bet on this gaming bill

Posted by Rob Holbert | Mar 3, 2021 | Damn the Torpedoes, by Rob Holbert | 0 |

I’ll admit to being a simple man. Sometimes things fly right over my head. For instance, I read Dr. Seuss books to my kids and during my own childhood and never realized they were totally racist and hurtful. Who knew? (Maybe Horton.)

It also took me a long time to realize every time Taco Bell comes out with a new item, it’s pretty much the same ingredients reorganized in a different way. Boy did I feel dumb when that one hit me.

So you’ll have to forgive me for not quite being able to wrap my head around what we’re trying to do when it comes to the gambling bill being pushed by Senator Del Marsh in Alabama’s current legislative session. I understand the basics — Marsh wants Alabama to cease being the only state in our region not benefiting from the citizens’ desires to shovel over money on games of chance such as lotteries, tossing dice or betting on college football. That part makes sense. 

What I don’t understand is why in doing this, the Legislature wants to create just five places where there can be casino-style gambling, and why most of them will be at dog tracks. I also don’t understand why when all of this is taken to the citizens to vote on a referendum, it has to be tied up together so they all either pass or fail together. 

Marsh said the other day he’s amenable to possibly adding two more casinos to his bill, but that would still lock Alabama in at just seven statewide. That may sound like a lot, but Mississippi, by comparison, has 36. Sixteen of those are in just three counties along the coast. 

I’m not saying we need a casino in every town, but we are seriously hamstringing ourselves by saying “Yes, we want casino gambling, but we’d like to do it in the most tepid and restrictive way possible.”

If this bill passes, Mobile’s opportunity for a casino would be Mobile Greyhound Park. That’s it. No cool casino on our riverfront. No converting the struggling GulfQuest maritime museum into a financial winner for the city, or turning the GM&O building into a palace that would revitalize a rough area of town and help draw in more tourists. Not even a big, new casino with a concert hall to replace the worn-out Civic Center. (These ideas are free city leaders. If you’d like more, please sign up for a premium account.)

Not to diss Mobile Greyhound Park, but really??? It’s a long way and a lot of money from offering an experience that would be competitive with what you get in Biloxi, unless we’re talking about visiting the really run-down parts of Biloxi. 

This bill more or less locks us into a handful of casinos for the foreseeable future, and also would allow Gov. Kay Ivey to pursue a “compact” with the Poarch Creek Indians (PCI) that would practically give them a monopoly on gambling in Alabama for decades. PCI already has three casinos operating in the state as well as ownership of Mobile Greyhound Park, and, under Marsh’s bill, the tribe would get to build a fifth casino location in the northern part of the state. 

It doesn’t appear there’s any prohibition from PCI purchasing Victoryland, GreenTrack and the Birmingham Racecourse either. So, theoretically, they could own all five locations along with the three they already have. 

That’s nothing against PCI. They have a very nice facility in Atmore, and Owa looks like the next Disney World in waiting, or at least Six Flags. I’m sure they would have quality facilities, although they might be more concerned about balancing them against one another so — for example — Mobile Greyhound Park wouldn’t draw business away from Wind Creek in Atmore. I’m sure that would be a consideration for any company that had businesses scattered across one state. Such concerns wouldn’t be the same for outside companies coming in. They would want to capture all the business they could get and might up the ante, so to speak, in terms of what we wind up with. 

I lived on the Mississippi Gulf Coast when casino gambling was approved there, and I remember watching the evolution. Those first casinos were rickety paddle wheelers or on sad-looking old cruise ships. That elevated rather quickly to fixed locations and hotels. When Katrina wiped out much of what had been done, all bets were off and the casinos have gotten bigger and better. In October, Universal Music announced plans to build a $1.2 billion hotel/entertainment complex where the old Broadwater Hotel stands. 

In roughly 30 years Biloxi has been transformed from a roughneck fishing town to a gaming Mecca. With our market locked up under one company and most of our casinos scattered across more lightly populated areas, how would Alabama hope to see that kind of development? What’s Mobile’s opportunity to get a $1.2 billion entertainment complex built once you can play blackjack at the dog park?

While there’s no doubt adding a lottery, sports betting and extending Class III casino-style games into the dog tracks, three existing PCI casinos and the casino-to-be-named-later will generate lots of money Alabama doesn’t currently have, that’s not a reason to make a bad deal. Gov. Ivey’s gaming study didn’t tell us anything surprising — yes, gambling will bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenue. There’s a reason Alabama is one of only five states that don’t have gaming or lotteries. They make money for the state. 

The reason for doing things the way Marsh’s bill would mandate is raw politics. We’re told this is the only way we’ll get anything. That’s probably why it’s all tied up in one referendum. Most people want a lottery and I’d assume far more are ambivalent about casinos, how many there are or who runs them. 

Still, no one has really explained why this is better than trying to get gaming passed and then letting the state gaming commission take applications for casinos around the state. Certainly, some might see opportunity in places like downtown Mobile or in Gulf Shores that would be locked out if Marsh’s bill becomes law. 

Alabama has waited a long time to get into the gambling business, so we’re already playing catch up. We need to do this in a way that gives us a chance to compete.

 

This page is available to our local subscribers. Click here to join us today and get the latest local news from local reporters written for local readers. The best deal is found by clicking here. Check it out now.

Share:

Rate:

PreviousBeers, blooms and tunes
NextNew year, new Nappies

About The Author

Rob Holbert

Rob Holbert

Rob Holbert is co-publisher and managing editor of Lagniappe, Mobile’s independent newspaper. Rob helped found the newspaper after a career that started as a police reporter and columnist at the Mississippi Press in Pascagoula. He followed that with a stint as a deputy press secretary for then-U.S. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott in Washington, D.C. After leaving Capitol Hill, Rob worked ghost-writing opinion articles for publication in some of the nation’s largest newspapers. From 1999 through Aug. 2010 he was the faculty adviser for the University of South Alabama student newspaper, The Vanguard, and in 2002 started Lagniappe with his business partner Ashley Trice. The paper now prints 30,000 copies every week and is distributed at more than 1,300 locations around Mobile and Baldwin Counties. According to Scarborough Research, Lagniappe now has more than 80,000 readers each week, with close to a quarter of that coming online. The paper began publishing weekly at the beginning of April 2014.

Related Posts

The next ‘Trial of the Century’ heats up

The next ‘Trial of the Century’ heats up

April 29, 2015

Judicial power run amok in Baldwin

Judicial power run amok in Baldwin

January 22, 2020

It’s time for Missiflorabama

It’s time for Missiflorabama

August 28, 2019

Epilogue for ‘Scandal of the Century’ players

Epilogue for ‘Scandal of the Century’ players

April 26, 2017

Recommended Stories

Regional talent in new ACAC show

By Kevin Lee

Grill’s sandwiches fall flat

By Andy MacDonald

Same old story in Baldwin

By Rob Holbert

Enjoy your last days of filth, you dirty animal

By Ashley Trice

No ‘Strings’ attached

By Stephen Centanni


  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Jobs
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Search This Site

Browse the Archives

© Lagniappe Mobile 2021

[yop_poll id=”-1″]